ProfessionalsNicholas P. Groombridge

Nicholas P. Groombridge
Partner

Tel: +1-212-373-3212
Fax: +1-212-492-0212
ngroombridge@paulweiss.com

+1-212-373-3212
New York

1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019-6064
Fax: +1-212-492-0212

Education 
Bar Admissions 
Education 
Bar Admissions 

A partner in the Litigation Department at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Nicholas Groombridge focuses exclusively on intellectual property litigation matters. Over the past 25 years, Nick has been extensively involved in all aspects of patent litigation, including trials (both bench and jury). He has been lead counsel in numerous patent infringement actions in federal district courts and has successfully argued many cases in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

EXPERIENCE

Nick has litigated patents in a wide variety of technical areas. In the area of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, he has handled numerous litigation and other matters involving biologics, drugs (both prescription and over-the-counter), drug delivery systems and research tools. His patent litigation experience also extends to a wide range of other technologies, including consumer electronics, specialty chemicals, automotive parts, financial services, medical devices, as well as software and web services.

Nick is a frequent speaker on developments in patent law and currently teaches a course on patent litigation at NYU School of Law. He has been quoted on intellectual property law issues in leading business publications, including The Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times and Fortune.

Nick has received many professional accolades. He is ranked in Chambers Global and Chambers USA as a Band 1 practitioner for Intellectual Property: Patent. Chambers describes him as “an incredibly good trial attorney who takes the time to master every detail of a case and dominates the courtroom with his knowledge of both the law and the facts.” The Legal 500 has described him as “a top-notch patent trial lawyer” and “an excellent strategic adviser,” who has  “a unique understanding of the way people think and an ability to get a message across.” He has been named a “National Litigation Star” for Intellectual Property by Benchmark Litigation, one of the Lawdragon “500 Leading Lawyers in America” and an expert in patent law in the Guide to the World’s Leading Patent Practitioners and The Best Lawyers in America.

Nick is active in several professional societies including the Federal Circuit Bar Association, of which he is a past president.

Representative cases include:

  • Biogen v. Bayer Healthcare, et al. Trial counsel for Biogen in a multi-billion dollar patent dispute involving recombinant beta interferon. Obtained a judgement in favor of Biogen on all liability issues following a five-week jury trial, with a damages trial yet to be scheduled;
  • Silver State Intellectual Technologies v. Garmin. Trial counsel for Garmin in a case involving navigation devices. Obtained a complete defense verdict including invalidity of all four asserted patents following a three-week jury trial in Las Vegas;
  • Edwards Lifesciences v. Medtronic. Trial counsel for Edwards in patent dispute involving transcatheter heart valve technology. Obtained a verdict of infringement and $394 million damages. Together with related matters, this case subsequently settled with payments to Edwards totaling approximately $1.1 billion;
  • Pacing Technology v. Garmin. Obtained summary judgment of non-infringement in a case involving Garmin fitness products;
  • General Electric v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Trial counsel for GE in patent dispute involving wind turbine technology. Obtained a verdict of infringement and $170 million damages;
  • CheckFree v. Metavante. Lead counsel for CheckFree and Fiserv in patent dispute between market leaders in providing electronic payment solutions to the banking industry; and
  • Triangle Software v. Garmin. Trial counsel for defendant Garmin in five patent cases involving portable navigation devices. Obtained favorable verdict on three patents. The jury hung on remaining two patents and the trial court granted JMOL of no infringement. The resulting judgment for Garmin was affirmed by the Federal Circuit.

© 2019 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP

Privacy Policy