skip to main content

We are fortunate to advise world-class, industry-leading companies, helping them tackle novel, complex issues and push the boundaries of technological progress. Our ability and confidence to go to trial is our core strength; our deep bench of experienced trial lawyers represents companies in their most significant matters, helping them protect their intellectual property and launch products. Our lawyers pair extensive experience in the courtroom and the boardroom with a thorough understanding of science and technology.

Intellectual Property Litigation: Patent Venue: ‘Regular and Established Place of Business’ After ‘In re Google’

March 10, 2021

Litigation partner Catherine Nyarady’s latest intellectual property litigation column, “Patent Venue: ‘Regular and Established Place of Business’ After ‘In re Google’,” appeared in the March 10 issue of the New York Law Journal. Catherine discusses recent decisions in In re Google and certain post-Google cases, which interpret the “regular and established place of business” aspect of the patent venue statute. The statute restricts patent infringement actions to a judicial district where the defendant resides or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business. In Google, the Federal Circuit held that venue over Google was improper in the Eastern District of Texas, where Google servers were used in non-Google-owned datacenters but Google had no employees or agents there. Litigation associate Michael Milea assisted in the preparation of this article.

» read the article

© 2023 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP

Privacy Policy