Led by one of the country's premier Supreme Court advocates, our Supreme Court and Appellate Practice regularly handles high-profile cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and federal and state appellate courts. Our lawyers consistently secure victories for our clients in some of the most complex and important cases of our time.
Second Circuit Review: Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
March 28, 2024
Litigation of counsel Martin Flumenbaum and firm Chairman Brad Karp’s latest Second Circuit Review column, “Subject-Matter Jurisdiction,” appeared in the March 28 issue of the New York Law Journal. The authors discuss a recent decision in Behrens v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., which raised the question of whether a district court is required to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction where it exists, even if it is invoked belatedly—a matter of first impression in the Second Circuit. The panel unanimously agreed with the district court that a party may forfeit subject-matter jurisdiction by failing to invoke it timely even though lack of subject-matter jurisdiction can be raised at any point in a proceeding. Joining three sister circuits in this finding, the Second Circuit’s decision clarifies that, while federal courts are obligated to ensure they do not lack subject-matter jurisdiction, they are not required to find and exercise subject-matter jurisdiction. It is up to litigants to proactively assert subject-matter jurisdiction arguments earlier in a proceeding to ensure that they do not forfeit them. Litigation associate Kristina Bunting assisted in the preparation of this column.
» read the article